
OR WAIT null SECS
© 2026 MJH Life Sciences™ , Pharmaceutical Technology - Pharma News and Development Insights. All rights reserved.
AI and machine learning are helping pharmaceutical scientists more efficiently develop innovative and novel treatments for a range of disease areas.
Pharmaceutical companies face a variety of challenges, such as the "patent cliff" and the difficulty of discovering new "blockbuster" drugs, when researching and developing potential new products (1). As part of the drug development toolbox, pharma companies are integrating AI and machine learning (ML) not only during discovery and development, but across the entire lifecycle of a drug (1,2). This technological shift is not merely about automation but reimagines how therapies are discovered, tested, and brought to market (1, 3).
A report from the Capgemini Research Institute details how the industry is moving to AI to reduce costs and clinical failure rates (4). A survey of 500 senior executives across eight countries found that a majority (82%) believe AI will fundamentally transform biopharma R&D, with 63% saying that a failure to scale AI will leave companies behind when it comes to innovation and market relevance (4). They also anticipate that in the next decade, most new molecular entities will be created using AI-driven platforms.
Poor solubility of new chemical entities is consistently a challenge in drug development, with an estimated 70–90% of drug candidates categorized as poorly soluble (5, 6). Traditionally, identifying the right formulation for these "brick dust" or "greaseball" molecules required extensive and expensive empirical trial-and-error (5,6). However, in-silico modeling using AI and ML is now being leveraged to predict physicochemical properties and guide early-stage decision making (5,6). Researchers can identify optimal solubilization methods and suitable excipients by utilizing tools like quantum mechanical calculations and molecular dynamics simulations (5). This "ultra-material-sparing" approach significantly reduces API consumption and saves money in research costs (5). A notable example is the evaluation of the compound CVN424, for which predictive modeling guided the selection of spray-dried formulations, accelerating the overall development timeline (6).
The use of digital twins in preclinical evaluation is revolutionizing how drugs are tested on human organs (7). For example, by using an ex-vivo lung perfusion system, researchers can keep human lungs alive outside the body to collect "clean" multimodal data. Machine learning models then use these data to create a personalized digital control arm for every organ being treated.
This approach allows for a direct comparison between observed treatment effects and a digital twin-generated, "untreated" outcome within the same organ. By reducing the reliance on large control groups and traditional animal models, digital twins may reduce study sizes and accelerate clinical trials (7).
New regulations in the European Union requiring complex joint clinical assessments has added to the burden of regulatory compliance and health technology assessments. Generative AI (GenAI) is being utilized to work with the raw data to complete these submissions (8) by automating the creation of clinical evidence summaries, reducing the time spent on initial dossier drafting by approximately 40% in some cases.
Beyond documentation, agentic AI can automate labor-intensive processes in trial master file management, intaking and classifying documents with "human-in-the-loop" checkpoints for quality control (9).
While general-purpose AI models are proficient in language, they often lack the depth required for the highly regulated pharmaceutical market (9). To combat this, domain-specific language models can be trained on proprietary enterprise documentation, such as batch records and validated procedures to support high-stakes decisions regarding drug manufacturing and clinical protocols (10).
To improve communication between regulators and drug developers, secure cloud environments, like the PRISM project, are enabling both parties to work on the same documents in real-time, using AI agent-like functions to accelerate the regulatory process and ensure that safety and efficacy are addressed long before a product reaches the patient (1,2).
In recent years, drug developers have put a lot of time, money, and effort into oncology. In January 2026, SOPHiA GENETICS, a company working in AI-driven precision medicine, announced a collaboration with MD Anderson Cancer Center, which will utilize SOPHiA GENETIC’s AI-powered analytics platform. The organizations will launch research and development programs and co-develope a next-generation sequencing oncology test to translate complex multimodal data (11).
Also in January, the AI-drug discovery company Oxford Drug Design announced that it has successfully completed in vivo validation of a novel therapeutic approach targeting multiple tumor types in the development of a potential first-in-class cancer therapy using its GenAI platform (12). “In studies using a genetically engineered mouse model that replicates the earliest mutational events in colorectal cancer, Oxford Drug Design’s lead compound demonstrated statistically significant anti-tumor activity with efficacy comparable to that of rapamycin–a benchmark therapy– while showing no detectable signs of toxicity,” the company explained in a press release (12).
Iktos, a company that applies AI and robotics to drug discovery, entered into a multi-target collaboration agreement with the pharmaceutical company Servier with the goal of leveraging Iktos’ AI-orchestrated discovery platform to accelerate the design and optimization of novel small-molecule therapeutics in oncology and neurology. Iktos will apply its generative AI and AI-orchestrated robotics platform to design, synthesize, and optimize small molecules for multiple undisclosed targets, which will then be evaluated and potentially selected by Servier for preclinical and clinical development (13).
Experts stress that AI and other digital technologies are force multipliers, not replacements for human expertise (7,9). Successful integration requires a "digitally fluent" workforce who can supervise automated systems and interpret AI-generated impact assessments (3). By automating administrative burdens, AI allows scientists and regulatory experts to return to the core of their work: scientific reasoning and clinical judgment (2, 8).
Responsible deployment of AI and machine learning creates a more efficient and equitable path to innovation, shortening the time between the discovery of a molecule and the treatment of a patient (8).
Susan Haigney is lead editor for Pharmaceutical Technology®.