
OR WAIT null SECS
© 2026 MJH Life Sciences™ , Pharmaceutical Technology - Pharma News and Development Insights. All rights reserved.
Peter Makowenskyj, senior director of Design Consulting at G-CON, and Beata Sweryda-Krawiec, associate director at Boehringer-Ingelheim, discussed trends influencing the design of pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities during a Quick Fire Learning Lab at INTERPHEX 2026.
In the evolving landscape of pharmaceutical manufacturing, the industry is reaching a point where strategic facility design must balance immediate market demands with long-term operational sustainability. Current market drivers are influenced by the twin requirements of cost and speed to market, though these needs are becoming increasingly nuanced depending on the specific drug type and company profile.
Peter Makowenskyj, senior director of Design Consulting at G-CON, and Beata Sweryda-Krawiec, associate director at Boehringer-Ingelheim, took a look at the decisions being made by pharmaceutical companies when it comes to current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) facility design during a Quick Fire discussion, “Drivers for Future cGMP Facilities” at INTERPHEX on Tuesday, April 21, 2026.1 The event is being held in New York City from April 21-23, 2026.
Tension exists in modern pharmaceutical facility design between engineering-based controls and procedural-based controls.Often, projects facing budget constraints look to “value engineer” designs by reducing engineering controls—such as physical segregation techniques for material and personnel flow—in favor of instituting stricter procedural controls. However, this creates a significant trade-off, as it shifts the burden of criticality onto the quality team and increases long-term operating costs compared to robust upfront engineering.
Makowenskyj and Sweryda-Krawiecemphasized that the industry is moving away from traditional construction methodologies that relied on readily available materials not originally designed for pharmaceutical use. Instead of selecting the cheapest materials, designers should prioritize cost-effective materials that offer the best performance over the entire lifecycle of the facility. Choosing inferior materials can lead to compounding maintenance costs and higher operational expenses over time.
Operating costs remain a concern, particularly the fixed costs associated with maintaining 24/7 environmental conditions, such as air cycle rates and temperatures. The industry has seen a trend, especially within the advanced therapy medicinal products and contract development and manufacturing organization sectors, where many new facilities were built with low utilization rates due to small product pipelines. Maintaining high utilization rates is essential for facility viability, as low utilization can lead to industry consolidation.
The future of pharmaceutical facilities is linked to digitalization, which serves as the foundation for leveraging data effectively. Key technological shifts include:
As these technologies advance, regulatory harmonization between global agencies remains a challenge. While many enabling technologies for agile and point-of-care manufacturing were discussed a decade ago, only now is the technology and regulatory support from agencies like the FDA catching up to make these independent, decentralized facilities a reality.
The panel suggested the industry shift from focusing solely on CapEx to a focus on the total cost of investment over time. By putting more money into the upfront design and choosing the right technological integrations, companies can ensure their facilities operate with maximum efficiency and lower total costs throughout their functional lifespan.